The Acute Effect of Post-Activation Potentiation with Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation on Some Electrophysiological and Functional Variables of Athletic Men

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Neuromuscular Exercise, Mazandaran University

2 Associate Professor of exercise Physiology, Mazandaran University

3 Assistant Professor of Sports Biomechanic and Motor Behavior, Mazandaran University

4 Asistant Professor of Neurophysics, Babol Noushirvani University of Technology

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of combined post-activation potentiation (PAP) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on maximal muscle activity in maximum voluntary isometric contraction test (MVIC) and integrated electromyography (IEMG) when knee extension was kept on the leg extension machine. 10 athlete students from wrestling, track and field and volleyball with mean age of 29/1 years performed one of four protocols that included usual warm-up plus sham tRNS (control group), usual warm-up plus tRNS, usual warm-up plus performing a set of right leg extension (80% of 1 repetition maximal) on the leg extension machine and usual warm-up plus tRNS plus a set of right leg extension in four separate sessions which occurred 24 hours after each other. The brain waves activity levels and electromyogram activity of vastus lateralis, rectus femoris and vastus medialis muscles were recorded simultaneously by using electroencephalography and electromyography respectively when the subjects performed were performing the test. The results showed a significant increase in the absolute power of all three brain waves in the Cz channel for every three conditions of the post-test compared to the pre-test during both MVIC (P=0.001) and keeping leg extension tests on leg extension machine(P=0.001). The amounts of maximum muscle activity for MVIC test and muscle IEMG values during keeping leg extension on the leg extension machine showed a significant increase in every three post-test conditions compared to the pre-test for all muscles (P=0.001). The duration of keeping leg extension on the leg extension machine was significantly increased for every three post-test conditions compared to the pre-test (P=0.001). It seems applying of tRNS and PAP, and also combined use of them after warm up can increase brain activity, maximum muscle activity, integrated electromyography and the duration of keeping leg extension in both tests compering to just warm up. Ultimatly, combined use of tRNS and PAP has an impressive effect compared to applying them separately.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Bank ST. Postactivation potentiation: Practical implications in the collegiate setting. [Mastersʼs thesis]. [Missoula]: University of Montana; 2016.
  2. Ruggiero L. Neural contribution to postactivation potentiation. [Master’s thesis]. [Jyväskylä, Finland ]: University of Jyväskylä; 2015.
  3. Daniel B, Sebastian R, David B, Carl F. Post-activation potentiation (PAP) in endurance sports. EUR J Sport SCI. 2018;18(4): 595-610.
  4. Xenofondos A, Laparidis K, Kyranoudis A, Galazoulas Ch, Bassa E, Kotzamanidis C. Post-activation potentiation: Factors affecting it and the effect on performance. J Phy Edu Sport. 2010;28(3):32-8.
  5. José O, Alex C, Carolina B, Alexandre S. Effect of postactivation potentiation on short sprint performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Sports Med. 2017;8(4):145-66.
  6. Laurent S, Gregory H. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;46(2):231-40.
  7. Gardiner PF. Advanced neuromuscular exercise physiology. Illinois: Hum Kin;   First Edition: 2011. 113-5.
  8. Artur G, Adam M, Adam Z, Kazimierz M, Petr S. Optimizing post activation potentiation for explosive activities in competitive sports. Hum Kin. 2016;52:95-106.
  9. Latash ML. Neurophysiological basis of movement. Hum Kin. 2008; 195-7.
  10. Yasuto I, Kei S, Ryoki S, Shota T, Shota Miyaguchi, Sho Kojima, et al. Comparison of three non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation methods for increasing cortical excitability. Fro Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:668-75.
  11. Andrea A, Christoph H. Transcranial alternating current and random noise stimulation: Possible mechanisms. Neu Plas. 2016;12:30-7.
  12. Kerrie H, Janet T, Colleen L. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability. Convulsive The. 2014;31(1):67-72.
  13. Roi K. The stimulated brain: Cognitive enhancement using non-invasive brain stimulation. Massachusetts: Academic Press; First edition: 2014. 38-9.
  14. Leila Ch, Andrea A. Walter Paulus. Transcranial random noise stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA-receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive. Frontiers Hum Neu. 2015;9(125):218-25.
  15. Leila Ch, Gyula K, Csaba C, Mark G, Walter P, Andrea A. Short-duration transcranial random noise stimulation induces blood oxygenation level dependent response attenuation in the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2009;198:439-44.
  16. André B, Michael N, Colleen L. Transcranial direct current stimulation in neuropsychiatric disorders. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 88-9.
  17. Anna F, Cornelia P, Carlo M. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. Neu sci. 2011;31(43):15416-23.
  18. Vera M, Georg F, Andrea A. Comparing the Efficacy of Excitatory Transcranial Stimulation Methods Measuring Motor Evoked Potentials. Neural Pla. 2014;3:6-19.
  19. Ehsan A, Reza Gh, Hamid R, Zahra R, Kamran A, Abozar K. Changes in corticospinal excitability and motoneurones responsiveness during and within a time-course after submaximal fatiguing contractions. Sci Res Ins (Sport Phy). 2016;(39):33-50. (In Persian).
  20. Matt B. Strength testing: Predicting a one-rep max from repetitions to fatigue. J Phy Edu R D. 1993;64:88-90.
  21. Mohamad Sh, Samira Gh, Davood M, Zohre B, Ali K. The short-term effect of static and dynamic stretching exercises on the functional and common ratio of hamstring muscle to quadriceps in athletic women. Sci Res Ins (Sport Phy). 2016;(37):17-34. (In Persian).
  22. Juliana T, Mario C, Adriane S, Estélio D. Acute effects of static stretching on muscle strength. Biomedical Hum Kin. 2009;1:52-5.
  23. Marcelo C, Nilo O, Henrique B, Maurizio B, Paulo B, Felipe F, et al. Improving cycling performance: Transcranial direct current stimulation increases time to exhaustion in cycling. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):1371-86.
  24. Okano A, Fontes B, Montenegro A, Farinatti T, Cyrino S, Li M, et al. Brain stimulation modulates the autonomic nervous system, rating of perceived exertion and performance during maximal exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(18):1213-8.
  25. Luca A, James H, Samuele M, Alexis M. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise induced pain. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115(11):2311-9.
  26. Mohebi H, Norasteh A, Farahani H. Comparison of extensor and knee flexor muscle electromyography activity in two different Squat. Olympic. 2009;17(2):8-16. (In Persian).
  27. Jafrneshad T, Farahpoor N. Comparison of muscle electromyography activity in ancient artifical skill and breast press. Sports med stu. 2012;11:57-68. (In Persian).
  28. Daniella T, Leila Ch, Vera M, Andrea A, Walter P. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. Neuroscience. 2008;28(52):14147-55.
  29. Batista MA, Roschel H, Barroso R, Ugrinowitsch C, TricoliV. Influence of strength training background on postactivation potentiation response. Str Con Res. 2011;25(9):2496-2502.
  30. Ferreira SL, Panissa VL, Miarka B, Franchini E. Postactivation potentiation: Effect of various recovery intervals on bench press power performance. Str Con Res. 2012;26(3):739-44.
  31. Bapiran M, Rajabi H, Motamedi P. The effect of intensity and specificity of muscle pre-activation on maximum force, leg velocity and vertical jump performance in trained men. Sport Sci Res Ins (Sport Phy). 2016;(33):37-50. (In Persian).
  32. Bence O, Andrea A, Holger R, Walter P. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation. Restora Neu. 2014;32:403-10.
  33. Szu L, Chii J, Po W, Yu W. Analysis of electroencephalography alteration during sustained cycling exercise using power spectrum and fractal dimension. Paper presented at: International Automatic Control Conference; Taichung, Taiwan: 2016 Nov 9-11.
  34. Hendrik E, Filomeno C, Christian M, Jennifer B, Andrea P, Benno N. Changes in cortical activity measured with EEG during a high-intensity cycling exercise. J Neu phy. 2016;115:379-88.
  35. Joseph G, Klaus G, Scott M, Daniel F. Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J Neu phy. 2010;103:3526-34.
  36. Pedro R, Felix H, Florian G, Vinzenz T, Matthias L. Methodological aspects of EEG and body dynamics measurements during motion. Fro Hum Neu. 2014;24(8):156-72
  37. Chakarov V, Naranjo J, Schulte J, Omlor W, Huethe F, Kristeva R. Beta-range EEG-EMG coherence with isometric compensation for increasing modulated low-level forces. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102(2):1115-20.
  38. Thomas R, Roi K. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) mechanisms and its effects on cortical excitability and connectivity. Inh Met Dis. 2018;41:1123-30.
  39. Berkan G, Pedro S, Dylan E, Felipe F, Marom B. Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations. Neu Met. 2013;219(2):297-311.
  40. Angius L, Pageaux B, Hopker J, Marcora M, Mauger R. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors. Neuroscience. 2016;17(339):363-75.
  41. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, et al. SENIAM 9: European recommendations for surface electromyography. Roe Res Devel. 1999;15(2): 6-22.
  42. Peter K. The ABC of EMG. A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography. Noraxon USA. 2005;1:75-9.
  43. Tim B, Graham C, Richard M, Klaus R. Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus: Discovery, mechanisms and function. Neuroforum. 2018; 24(3):103-20.
  44. Cooke SF, Bliss TV. Plasticity in the human central nervous system. Brain. 2006;129:1659-73.
  45. Leila Ch, Walter P, Andrea A. Evaluating aftereffects of short-duration transcranial random noise stimulation on cortical excitability. Neu Plas. 2011;(4):5-17.
  46. Gerald H, Adrian P, Gustavo D, Arvind K. Portraits of communication in neuronal networks. Nat Rev Neu. 2019; 20:117–27.
  47. Dixon ML, Thiruchselvam R, Todd R, Christoff K. Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review. Psychol Bul. 2017;143(10):1033-81.
  48. Hamada T, Sale DG, Macdougall JD .Postactivation potentiation in endurance-trained male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):403-11.
  49. Farup J, Sorensen H. Postactivation potentiation: Upper body force development changes after maximal force intervention. J str con res. 2010;24(7):1874-9.
Sport Physiology
Volume 11, Issue 44
Winter 2020
February 2020
Pages 31-54

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 02 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 22 October 2019
  • Accept Date: 03 November 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics